Atiku’s Lawyer Absent As Court Gives Reasons For Dismissing Appeal

– The Supreme Court had, on October 30 dismissed the appeal and promised to give reasons for its decision on a latter date

– Alex Izinyon (SAN) who represented Buhari, drew the court’s attention to the strange development and noted that it was against the court’s rules for an appellant to stay away from court

– He noted that no lawyer announced appearance for the appellants and wondered if hearing notices were not served on them

As the Supreme Court begins proceedings to explain reasons why it dismissed the appeal by the Peoples Democratic party(PDP) and its candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar against the September 11, 2019 decision of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) upholding the second term election of President Muhammadu Buhari of the All Progressives Congress (APC),The PDP and its candidate in the last presidential election, are absent in court.

The Supreme Court had, on October 30 dismissed the appeal and promised to give reasons for its decision on a latter date.

When the court opened on Friday morning, the case was called, but no lawyer announced appearance for the petitioners. None of the PDP known faces were in court as against the situation on October 30, 2019 when chieftains of the party flooded the court.

READ ALSO: https://councillor-in-custody-over-n11m-fraud/

Alex Izinyon (SAN) who represented Buhari, drew the court’s attention to the strange development and noted that it was against the court’s rules for an appellant to stay away from court when a decision is being taken on the appeal.

He noted that no lawyer announced appearance for the appellants and wondered if hearing notices were not served on them.

Responding, Justice Okoro, who led a three-man panel, said that the appellants were served with hearing notices and that the court will proceed with the business of the day despite the appellants’ absence.

More Details later…..