Australia Bans Social Media For Children Under 16

Australia has passed what may become the world’s strictest social media laws, banning children under 16 from using platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.

The legislation, approved by the Senate, will impose fines of up to A$50 million ($32.5 million; £25.7 million) on companies that fail to comply. However, the changes won’t take effect for at least 12 months.

EDITOR’S PICKS

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described the move as essential to protecting children from the “harms” of social media, a stance echoed by many parent groups. “This is a global problem, and we want young Australians to have a childhood,” Albanese said, highlighting the importance of providing parents with peace of mind.

The bill, which passed the Senate by a vote of 34 to 19, will return to the House of Representatives for approval of minor amendments before becoming law. Unlike similar laws in other countries, Australia’s legislation sets the highest age limit for social media use and does not allow exceptions for existing users or parental consent.

The ban applies to platforms designated by Australia’s communications minister, who will rely on advice from the eSafety Commissioner, the internet regulator tasked with enforcing the rules. Gaming and messaging platforms, as well as sites that don’t require accounts (e.g., YouTube), are exempt.

Age verification will be implemented using as-yet-untested technologies that may include biometrics or identity checks. The government has placed the responsibility for compliance on the platforms themselves, though researchers have expressed skepticism about the effectiveness and privacy implications of such measures.

Critics argue that the legislation leaves key questions unanswered, particularly regarding privacy and enforceability. Some digital experts warn that children can easily bypass restrictions using tools like VPNs, which disguise their location.

While no penalties will be imposed on children who evade the rules, major tech companies have pushed back against the legislation. TikTok has described the definition of a social media platform as “broad and unclear,” while Meta has labelled the measures “ineffective.” X (formerly Twitter) questioned the bill’s compatibility with international regulations and human rights treaties.

Youth advocates have also criticized the government for excluding young people from the debate, arguing that their voices are vital in crafting effective solutions. “We understand the risks of social media, but we need to be part of the conversation,” said the eSafety Youth Council, an advisory body to the regulator.

Polling suggests the reforms enjoy widespread support among Australian parents and caregivers. Amy Friedlander, a parent advocate for the ban, described the challenges parents face, saying, “For too long, we’ve had to choose between giving in to addictive devices or leaving our children feeling isolated.”