Donald Trump Loses Executive Privilege Case

• Donald Trump Loses Executive Privilege Case

• Federal judge denies Trump’s attempt to withhold records from Jan 6 committee

EKO HOT BLOG reports that in a strong rejection of Trump’s previous attempts to restrict information from his White House, a federal court will provide the US House access to hundreds of pages of papers from Donald Trump’s administration leading up to and regarding the January 6 attack on the US Capitol.

The order by Judge Tanya Chutkan of the US District Court in DC on Tuesday night marks a setback for Trump’s efforts to keep more than 700 pages of data from his White House hidden – but his legal team has told the court that they intend to appeal.

“Presidents are not kings,” she said, “and Plaintiff is not President.”

As of today, the National Archives is on pace to provide a number of documents to the House on Friday, including White House phone logs, video logs, and schedules from January 6, as well as three pages of handwritten notes from Trump’s then-chief of staff. The outcome in court may also aid the House in its pursuit of more information from those close to Trump, including witnesses who have been subpoenaed but have yet to testify before the committee.

“The court holds that the public interest lies in permitting — not enjoining — the combined will of the legislative and executive branches to study the events that led to and occurred on January 6, and to consider legislation to prevent such events from ever occurring again,” Chutkan wrote in a 39-page opinion.

The judge, in her ruling, shut down Trump’s arguments in court on several fronts.

She decided that a former president’s wishes couldn’t overcome the decisions of the current president regarding protecting privileged information of the executive branch. “It is the incumbent President who is best situated to protect executive branch interests,” Chutkan said.

She also knocked down Trump for any attempts to protect himself out of secrecy. Presidential privilege “exists for the benefit of the Republic, not any individual,” she wrote. Because of that, Congress and the courts can access presidential communications when there’s a need to inform the public, the judge decided.

In this case, the judge said she wouldn’t look at Trump’s records document by document and wouldn’t second-guess the Biden administration’s decision to release them. She also noted that though the committee has made sweeping requests for requests, it does “not exceed” its legislative power.

The former Republican President filed his lawsuit last month in DC District Court, claiming executive privilege and alleging that the House’s requests for documents are “unprecedented in their breadth and scope” and illegitimate.

The Biden White House has declined to intervene to block access to the Trump records. The National Archives, which inherited Trump’s presidential records after he left office, has said it will begin handing over records to the House committee next week, on November 12, with more document productions set for later in November.

The case has already become an historic test of the power of a former president. Some of the records Trump has sought to keep secret include White House visitor records, call logs, and notes from his top advisers related to his claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen and his reaction to the January 6 attack, according to a sworn declaration from the National Archives.

The House has argued to the court that Trump has no right to keep the documents confidential from his presidency and say the need for the records is to reconstruct Trump’s actions on January 6 and his efforts to undermine the 2020 election.
Rep.

Bennie Thompson, who chairs the House select committee, called the ruling a “big deal” for the congressional probe, telling CNN’s
Chris Cuomo on “Cuomo Prime Time” that he looks forward to the panel’s investigators “going through (the documents) with a fine-tooth comb to make sure that our government was not weaponized against its citizens.”

“We can only do that by getting access to the information. I applaud our lawyers who defended us in this court setting,” the Mississippi Democrat said. “I applaud the expeditious ruling that we got because we have to get to this.”