International
Judge Rejects Trump’s Bid to Delay Sentencing in Hush Money Case
- Appeals court denies Trump’s second bid to delay sentencing in hush money case.
- Judge Gesmer upholds the verdict; sentencing remains scheduled for Friday.
- Trump’s legal team argues presidential-elect immunity but faces court rejections.
President-elect Donald Trump is still slated for sentencing in his hush money case this week after a New York appeals court judge swiftly dismissed his latest bid to postpone the proceedings.
Judge Ellen Gesmer, of the state’s mid-level appellate court, rejected Trump’s request on Tuesday to indefinitely delay sentencing while he appeals a prior ruling upholding the verdict.
EDITOR’S PICKS
- Polaris Bank’s Initiatives Ensure Continuous Education for Over 16,000 Students
- Verydarkman Pranks Nigerians: No N180 Missing From NGO Funds
- Why I Faked Missing N180m — VeryDarkMan
Trump’s sentencing remains scheduled for Friday, though his legal team may pursue further attempts to halt it, potentially appealing to higher courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.
Gesmer’s concise, one-sentence ruling offered no explanation for the decision. However, during an emergency hearing earlier in the day, she rigorously questioned both Trump’s lawyers and prosecutors. The president-elect did not attend.
The rapid developments follow Monday’s rejection by the trial judge, Juan M. Merchan, of Trump’s initial attempt to delay sentencing.
During the hearing, Trump’s lawyer, Todd Blanche, argued that as president-elect, Trump is entitled to the same immunity from criminal proceedings as a sitting president.
FURTHER READING
- Why We Must Increase Call, Data Tariffs In 2025 – Telecoms Operators
- 19 Year old Arraigned in Kaduna for Allegedly Stabbing Uncle
- Diversify or Face Poverty: Abbas Calls for Economic Shift
Judge Gesmer pressed Blanche, asking, “Do you have any support for the notion that presidential immunity extends to the president-elect?” Blanche admitted, “There’s never been a case like this before. So no.”
Merchan previously dismissed claims of immunity for a president-elect. Prosecutor Steven Wu reinforced the argument, citing the principle of “one president at a time” as Trump prepares to take office on January 20.
Blanche countered, warning that the case’s continuation risks disrupting Trump’s presidential transition, which he characterized as critical to national security and the country’s vital interests.
Click here to watch our video of the week:
Advertise or Publish a Story on EkoHot Blog:
Kindly contact us at [email protected]. Breaking stories should be sent to the above email and substantiated with pictorial evidence.
Citizen journalists will receive a token as data incentive.
Call or Whatsapp: 0803 561 7233, 0703 414 5611
You must be logged in to post a comment Login