Lagos Drags FG, National Assembly To Supreme Court, See Why

The Lagos State Government has instituted a legal action against the federal government and the national assembly.

The litigation followed the obstruction of judgment delivery via virtual means by the two respondents because, according to them, it is Unconstitutional.

Subsequently, the state approached the Supreme Court asking it to determine the constitutionality of virtual court hearings.

Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) and the National Assembly are the respondents in the suit.

It noted, among others, that different views on whether or not virtual court proceedings are lawful, is causing trepidation over proceedings already conducted virtually in compliance with Practice Directions issued by the Chief Judge of Lagos State.

Also Read: Gbolahan Lawal Finally Enthroned As Oniru — Receives Staff Of Office

Lagos, through its Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Moyosore Onigbanjo (SAN), is asking the court to determine whether by Section 36(1), (3) and (4) of the 1999 Constitution, “the use of technology by remote hearings…whether by Zoom, Microsoft Teams, WhatsApp, Skype or any other audio visual or video-conference platform by the Lagos State High Court or any other Courts in Nigeria in aid of hearing and determination of cases are constitutional”.

The Plaintiff also seeks clarification on whether “…the National Assembly can usurp the powers of the Chief Judge of Lagos State under Section 274 of the Constitution by commencing the process for the amendment of Section 36(3) and (4) of the Constitution to include virtual or remote hearings”

The state is further “seeking a Declaration that the Constitution, especially Sections 36 (3) and (4) are adequate to accommodate virtual or remote hearings…as provided for in the Practice Directions issued by the Chief Judge of Lagos State dated 4th and 15th May 2020.”

It also prayer the court to make  “a declaration that it is not within the legislative competence of the 2nd Defendant or any other body, person or authority to make laws or otherwise amend the Constitution for the regulation of the practice and procedure of the courts of Lagos State having regard to Section 274 of the Constitution.

“the Bill presented before the 2nd Defendant seeking to specifically include remote hearing in the Constitution constitutes a usurpation of judicial function”.

A counsel in the Lagos State Ministry of Justice, Oluwayemisi Osisanya, averred in a 45 paragraph supporting affidavit that following the outbreak of coronavirus pandemic which made physical judicial proceedings in courts in Lagos practically impossible , the National Judicial Council (NJC) issued guidelines on May 7, 2020 to aid the dispensation of justice in Nigeria.

She further averred that pursuant to the provisions of Section 274 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) the Chief Judge of Lagos State issued Practice Directions to accommodate virtual or remote hearing.