- Trump described Adelson as his largest campaign donor
- Trump has previously insisted he was “not joking” about a third term, saying many supporters want him to remain in office
- The Adelson family has long been associated with strong pro-Israel advocacy
Former U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that Israeli-American billionaire donor, Miriam Adelson, offered him $250 million to support a potential third-term bid in 2028, despite constitutional limits.
Eko Hot Blog reports that Trump made the assertion on Tuesday night while speaking at a White House Hanukkah reception, where he praised Adelson’s political support and invited her on stage.
EDITOR’S PICK
- Confusion of Police Tinted Glass Permit Enforcement
- Ibeju-Lekki Chairman Inaugurates Security Committee to Strengthen Community Safety
- Court Upholds NCPC, NAHCON Acts, Dismisses Constitutional Challenge
Addressing guests in the East Room, Trump described Adelson as his largest campaign donor, suggesting that her financial backing was tied to discussions about extending his time in office.
Adelson, widow of late casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, later told the gathering that she had recently spoken with Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz about the possibility of Trump remaining in power beyond two terms.
Her remarks sparked chants of “Four more years” from the audience, prompting Trump to claim that Adelson had pledged an additional $250 million if he chose to pursue the idea.
Although Trump has repeatedly hinted at a return in 2028, the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution bars presidents from serving more than two terms.
Trump has previously insisted he was “not joking” about a third term, saying many supporters want him to remain in office, though he has also offered conflicting comments suggesting such a move might be inappropriate.
The Adelson family has long been associated with strong pro-Israel advocacy, having influenced key policy decisions during Trump’s first term, including the relocation of the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem.
While the former president continues to fuel speculation, it remains unclear whether his remarks reflect political theatrics or a serious constitutional challenge.
FURTHER READING
