- Justice Joyce Obehi Abdulmalik rules the bail request is premature and denies the legal team’s motion.
- The former governor remains in ICPC custody following his transfer from the EFCC without prior notice.
- El-Rufai has filed a 1 billion Naira suit against the government for the alleged unlawful invasion of his home.
The Federal High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on Wednesday declined to hear the bail application filed by the former governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-Rufai.
Eko Hot Blog reports that the presiding Justice Joyce Obehi Abdulmalik declared the request immature, stalling the legal team’s efforts to secure his release from detention.
EDITOR’S PICK
- 540 Candidates Cleared as Lagos APC Moves to Elect LGA Executives
- Court Sentences Pastor to Death for Killing UniUyo Student
- Lagos Teacher Questions Lack of Recognition for One-Day Governor Mentors
The court subsequently adjourned the matter until April 23, 2026, when the former governor is expected to be properly arraigned. El-Rufai was notably absent from the proceedings as he remains in the custody of the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
The courtroom session was observed by several political figures, including Bolaji Abdullahi of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), reflecting the high political stakes surrounding the case.
A lawyer present during the session noted that the court’s refusal to allow the bail application to be moved effectively keeps El-Rufai in custody for the next two months.
This ruling marks the latest chapter in a deepening legal confrontation between the former governor and federal anti-corruption agencies that began with a dramatic raid on his Abuja residence.
The legal battle escalated on February 20, 2026, when El-Rufai filed a 1 billion Naira fundamental rights enforcement suit against the ICPC, the Inspector-General of Police, and the Attorney-General of the Federation.
His counsel, Oluwole Iyamu, SAN, argued that the February 19 invasion of El-Rufai’s Mambilla Street residence was based on a defective and invalid search warrant.
The defense team contended that the warrant lacked specificity and contained material errors, rendering the search and subsequent detention of the former governor a violation of his constitutional rights.
Reports from El-Rufai’s camp have raised alarms over his health and treatment while in detention.
His media adviser, Muyiwa Adekeye, alleged that the former governor suffered a nosebleed during his time in custody and has been denied access to meals provided by his family.
Adekeye also criticized the procedural handling of the case, claiming El-Rufai was moved overnight from the EFCC to the ICPC without notifying his family or legal representatives.
The defense maintains that no valid remand order has been produced to justify holding him beyond the legally permitted timeframe.
With the adjournment to April 23, the former governor faces a prolonged period in detention before he can formally plead to any charges.
The case has sparked significant debate over the use of anti-corruption agencies in political matters and the adherence to judicial procedures during high-profile investigations.
As the legal teams prepare for the April arraignment, the focus remains on whether the court will eventually address the alleged human rights violations cited in El-Rufai’s 1 billion Naira countersuit.
