- A former federal agency head has officially refused to step down for a preferred candidate, insisting on a competitive and transparent party primary for the 2027 race.
- The move sets up a high-stakes confrontation against the “anointed” choice reportedly backed by the state’s current leadership.
- Stakeholders from all three senatorial zones have unanimously voted for the contest to proceed, citing the need for fairness and a performance-based selection process.
The race for the 2027 governorship in Nasarawa State has entered a turbulent phase as a prominent contender and former Executive Vice Chairman of NASENI declared his refusal to bow to handpicked political interests.
Eko Hot Blog reports that speaking at a critical gathering in Keffi on Saturday, April 25, 2026, the aspirant told a crowd of supporters that the era of “anointed” successors must give way to a true democratic contest.
EDITOR’S PICKS
- JAMB Delists 23 CBT Centres, Warns 89 After Mock UTME Review
- NASA Astronauts Return to Earth After First Human Trip to the Moon in 50 Years
- INEC Shifts Nationwide Voter Revalidation Until After 2027 General Election
This declaration is a bold pushback against reports that the state’s current leadership has already settled on a preferred successor.
The aspirant, a foundational member of the party, argued that the “blanket cheque” once offered for leadership selection has expired.
He emphasized that he is not being disobedient but is simply demanding that the party respect the constitutional rights of all qualified contenders to test their popularity at the polls.
During the session, stakeholders deliberated on the future of the race, with many arguing that fairness and “micro-zoning” principles must be respected to ensure local governments that have been historically sidelined get a fair hearing.
The assembly reached a unanimous verdict, urging the contender to proceed to the primaries, a mandate he accepted while announcing a major campaign rally for this coming Wednesday.
The resolve to maintain a competitive race has sent ripples through the state’s political circles.
By insisting on a primary election, the aspirant has effectively signaled that the party ticket will not be won in private offices but through a transparent vote.
As the transition approaches, this move underscores a growing demand within the party for a process that prioritizes merit and local equity over executive preference.
