- The claims about questionable signatures on the suspension report have sparked calls for an official investigation
- Lawmakers are expected to address the issue during an emergency plenary session in Abuja
Fresh tension has emerged in the Senate as lawmakers prepare to reconvene on Tuesday, with indications that the upper chamber may launch a formal investigation into allegations made by Senator Adams Oshiomhole regarding the suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.
Eko Hot Blog gathered that the matter is expected to be a major item at an emergency plenary session convened by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, following claims that signatures of some senators were improperly attached to the committee report that recommended Akpoti-Uduaghan’s six-month suspension.
EDITOR’S PICK
- Federal Lawmaker Yaya Tongo Dies In Abuja Hospital
- Rep. Wale Raji Celebrates Alhaja Aduke Salimot Seriki on Birthday
- Nancy Isime Recalls Alex Ekubo’s Fearless Humor, Generosity at Late Actor’s Tribute
Oshiomhole later clarified that he did not accuse any senator of forging signatures, insisting his comments were misunderstood. However, the controversy has continued to generate concern within the Senate, with several lawmakers reportedly pushing for an official institutional response.

Senate spokesperson Yemi Adaramodu said the chamber would not ignore allegations that touch on its integrity, adding that the Senate would review the comments and take an appropriate position after proper consideration.
He maintained that no senator had formally complained about forged signatures in the suspension process, describing the claims as unfounded and unacceptable.
Meanwhile, Senator Ireti Kingibe added a new layer to the debate, saying she did not see the report that led to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension because she was attending a retreat when it was considered. She also said she had previously raised concerns about not having access to the document during deliberations.

The controversy traces back to the March 2025 suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan over alleged misconduct, a decision that also led to the withdrawal of her salaries and allowances, closure of her office, and restriction from the National Assembly complex.
The issue has remained politically sensitive within the chamber, and recent comments have now reignited debate over the integrity of the process that led to the disciplinary action.
FURTHER READING





