Court Martial Under Fire Over Alleged Abuse Of Detained Officers

Court Martial Under Fire Over Alleged Abuse Of Detained Officers
Families barred as concerns rise over transparency and fair hearing
Trial adjourned amid pressure on authorities to ensure due process

The General Court Martial convened by the Defence Headquarters has drawn criticism over allegations of inhumane treatment, denial of fair hearing and restricted access to proceedings involving detained military officers.

No fewer than 36 officers standing trial over alleged coup related offences were brought before the military court in leg chains, with some reportedly showing signs of physical abuse and declining health.

EDITOR’S PICKS

EKO HOT BLOG reports that sources familiar with the proceedings told Sahara Reporters that the atmosphere during sittings was “deeply disturbing,” alleging that several of the accused struggled to stand due to untreated wounds and prolonged detention.

The proceedings, held at the Scorpion Officers’ Mess in Asokoro, Abuja, have been conducted under tight security, with access limited to authorised personnel.

Family members of the accused were reportedly barred from attending, raising concerns about transparency and compliance with constitutional provisions on fair hearing.

The court martial, convened under the Armed Forces Act by Major General A.M. Alechenu, is chaired by Air Vice Marshal H.I. Alhaji and includes senior officers from the Nigerian Army, Navy and Air Force.

Concerns have also emerged over claims that some members of the panel were previously accused by the defendants of involvement in acts of torture during investigations.

“The same individuals accused of supervising or enabling torture are now part of the system determining the fate of these officers. That raises serious questions about justice and impartiality,” a source said.

Although the specific charges were not disclosed in the convening order, sources said the case is linked to an alleged coup conspiracy within the armed forces.

Those standing trial include senior officers such as a brigadier general, colonels, lieutenant colonels and other ranks.

Despite provisions guaranteeing the right to legal representation, questions have been raised over whether the accused have adequate access to independent counsel of their choice.

While medical personnel were assigned to assess detainees before each sitting, sources alleged that proper treatment had not been provided.

“The presence of a medical officer means nothing if those in need of treatment are left to deteriorate in chains,” another source said.

Proceedings have followed strict administrative directives, including mandatory searches for all individuals entering the courtroom, a ban on electronic devices and heavy deployment of security personnel.

The case was adjourned to May 12, 2026, as pressure grows on military authorities to address concerns over due process, humane treatment and transparency.